Motto for Freedom Activists Dont Be Unreasonable

Motto for freedom activists dont be unreasonable – Motto for freedom activists don’t be unreasonable. This motto delves into the complex relationship between freedom and reason in activism. It explores the nuances of what constitutes “freedom” across history and philosophy, examining how different interpretations shape activism. Furthermore, it investigates how “unreasonableness” manifests in various social and political contexts, including historical examples of freedom movements. We’ll also look at the motivations and strategies employed by activists, considering the consequences of actions perceived as unreasonable.

Finally, we’ll discuss the balance between freedom, responsibility, and reason, and the role of communication in shaping public perception.

The core argument hinges on the idea that effective freedom activism often requires a thoughtful and reasoned approach. While passion and unwavering commitment are vital, actions must be strategically considered to maximize impact and avoid alienating potential allies. This exploration aims to provide a framework for activists to navigate these complexities, ultimately achieving their goals while maintaining a commitment to reason and understanding.

Defining “Freedom” and “Unreasonableness”: Motto For Freedom Activists Dont Be Unreasonable

Freedom, a concept deeply intertwined with human aspiration, has been interpreted in countless ways throughout history. From the ancient Greek ideal of self-governance to the modern emphasis on individual liberties, its meaning has evolved alongside societal structures and philosophical thought. Understanding this multifaceted concept is crucial to navigating the complexities of social and political discourse.The pursuit of freedom is often intertwined with the perceived need to avoid “unreasonableness,” which can manifest in various forms.

This exploration examines the nuances of freedom, its historical context, and the diverse expressions of unreasonableness. Understanding the interplay between these two concepts is critical for fostering a more just and equitable society.

Defining Freedom

Freedom, in its broadest sense, signifies the absence of external constraints on individual actions and choices. However, this seemingly simple definition belies a complex tapestry of interpretations. Historically, freedom has been understood through various lenses: philosophically, it encompasses the ability to make rational choices and pursue self-determined ends; politically, it represents the right to participate in governance and hold power accountable; and socially, it embodies the ability to express oneself and interact with others without fear of oppression.

Different philosophical traditions offer contrasting perspectives on the extent and nature of individual freedom, often emphasizing different aspects of human experience. For example, John Stuart Mill’s concept of liberty centers on the importance of individual expression and autonomy, while other schools of thought, such as communitarianism, place greater emphasis on the role of community and shared values in defining freedom.

Defining Unreasonableness

Unreasonableness, in social and political contexts, encompasses a range of behaviors and attitudes that deviate from rational thought and informed decision-making. It manifests in various ways: irrational fears and prejudices, leading to discriminatory practices; emotional outbursts that obstruct productive dialogue; and adherence to dogma that prevents critical evaluation of evidence. These examples highlight the crucial role of reason in navigating complex social issues and maintaining a functional society.

Overlaps and Distinctions Between Freedom and Reasonableness

Freedom and reasonableness, while often seen as complementary, can also present subtle overlaps and distinctions. Freedom, in its purest form, is the ability to choose, while reasonableness dictates thequality* of those choices. Unreasonable choices, even when freely made, may undermine the very freedom they seek to protect, creating a vicious cycle. For instance, freedom of speech, while crucial, must be balanced with the responsibility to use that freedom reasonably.

The expression of opinions should not infringe on the rights or well-being of others.

Philosophical Perspectives on Freedom and Reason

Philosophical Viewpoint	Definition of Freedom	Role of Reason
Liberalism	Emphasis on individual rights and liberties, including freedom of thought, speech, and action.	Reason is crucial for making informed decisions about the best course of action for society.
Communitarianism	Freedom is understood within the context of community and shared values.	Reason is important for understanding and upholding the common good.
Existentialism	Freedom is the ability to create one’s own meaning and values.	Reason plays a role in navigating choices and constructing meaning, but it’s not the sole determinant.
Marxism	Freedom is achieved through the emancipation from socioeconomic constraints.	Reason is used to understand and overcome oppressive systems.

This table illustrates how different schools of thought approach the concepts of freedom and the role of reason in achieving it.

Historical Context of Freedom Activism

The struggle for freedom is a tapestry woven with threads of courage, sacrifice, and often, perceived “unreasonableness.” Examining historical freedom movements provides crucial insights into the evolving nature of activism and the challenges faced by those who dared to question the status quo. Understanding these historical precedents allows us to better appreciate the present-day battles for liberty and the ongoing tension between progress and perceived “unreasonableness.”A deep dive into the past reveals a recurring pattern: movements for freedom often face resistance from those in power who deem their methods or demands “unreasonable.” This resistance, rooted in the desire to maintain the existing order, frequently takes the form of suppression, violence, and accusations of extremism.

A motto for freedom activists should be “Don’t be unreasonable.” While advocating for change is crucial, it’s equally important to understand the complexities involved, like the technical advancements in home networking, particularly in the context of home lans over power lines take two. Ultimately, a balanced approach, informed by the realities of the situation, is key to achieving true freedom.

Yet, these struggles, often deemed “unreasonable” at the time, frequently paved the way for significant societal shifts.

Examples of “Unreasonable” Freedom Movements

Freedom movements throughout history have frequently been met with resistance from those in power. These movements, often characterized by unconventional tactics and radical demands, were labeled “unreasonable” by the dominant forces of the time. For example, the abolitionist movement in the United States, advocating for the end of slavery, faced fierce opposition from slaveholders who saw their economic interests threatened by such a radical shift.

Similarly, the women’s suffrage movement, demanding the right to vote, was often met with ridicule and accusations of disrupting the established social order.

A motto for freedom activists should be “Don’t be unreasonable.” Finding the right tools for the job is crucial, and that includes considering the best handheld devices, like searching for the right handheld option. After all, effective communication and organization are key to any successful movement, and the right technology can empower activists to spread their message further and faster.

Keeping things reasonable and pragmatic is important for achieving lasting change.

Historical Figures Challenging the Status Quo

Numerous historical figures stood as powerful symbols of defiance against oppressive systems. These individuals challenged the status quo through their actions, words, and strategies, often facing severe consequences. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance, though considered “unreasonable” by the British colonial authorities, ultimately proved instrumental in India’s independence movement. Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr., through his advocacy of nonviolent civil disobedience, challenged racial segregation in the United States.

These figures understood that sometimes, to achieve true freedom, one must defy the prevailing norms of reason as defined by the powerful.

Key Events and Turning Points

Several pivotal moments in history illustrate the evolving relationship between freedom movements and perceived reasonableness. The American Revolution, a rebellion against British rule, was initially met with accusations of rebellion and treason. The French Revolution, with its radical demands for social and political change, was equally met with condemnation from established European powers. These events demonstrate that the definition of “reasonableness” often depends on the perspective of those in power and the evolving understanding of individual rights and liberties.

Evolution of Freedom and Reasonableness

Era	Concept of Freedom	Notions of Reasonableness
Ancient Greece	Freedom as self-governance within the polis	Reasonableness tied to civic duty and participation
Enlightenment	Freedom as individual rights and liberties	Reasonableness based on logic and natural law
19th Century	Freedom as abolition of slavery and expansion of suffrage	Reasonableness as a justification for social change
20th Century	Freedom as civil rights and self-determination	Reasonableness tied to the protection of minority rights
21st Century	Freedom as global human rights and social justice	Reasonableness as an evolving concept that includes diverse perspectives

This table illustrates the historical evolution of freedom and its accompanying concept of reasonableness. The definitions of freedom and what constitutes reasonable action have shifted over time, reflecting societal progress and evolving understandings of justice.

Motivations and Strategies of Freedom Activists

Freedom activism, a powerful force for societal change, is driven by a complex interplay of motivations. From the desire for basic human rights to the pursuit of broader social justice, the reasons behind these movements are as varied as the individuals and groups involved. Understanding these motivations is crucial to comprehending the strategies employed and the potential consequences of their actions.The strategies employed by freedom activists often reflect the specific context of their struggles and the perceived obstacles they face.

These strategies can range from peaceful protests and civil disobedience to more confrontational approaches, depending on the perceived level of reasonableness in achieving their goals. It’s essential to acknowledge that the definition of “reasonable” is often contested, with different parties holding differing perspectives on the appropriateness and effectiveness of various tactics.

Diverse Motivations Driving Freedom Activists

Freedom activists are motivated by a multitude of factors. Economic inequality, political oppression, social injustice, and the denial of basic human rights frequently serve as catalysts for activism. The desire for self-determination, dignity, and a voice in shaping one’s own destiny is another powerful driving force. Furthermore, personal experiences of discrimination or injustice often fuel the resolve of activists, motivating them to fight for systemic change.

Examples of Strategies Employed by Freedom Activists

Activists employ a spectrum of strategies, reflecting the diverse nature of their motivations. These strategies can be categorized based on their approach to reasonableness. Some activists prioritize non-violent resistance and peaceful protests, believing that such methods are more likely to garner public support and achieve long-term success. Others, facing seemingly insurmountable obstacles, may adopt more confrontational tactics, recognizing that traditional methods may prove insufficient.

Strategies Categorized by Perceived Reasonableness, Motto for freedom activists dont be unreasonable

Strategy Category	Description	Examples	Consequences (Potential)
Reasonable Strategies	Strategies focusing on dialogue, negotiation, and non-violent resistance.	Peaceful demonstrations, civil disobedience, boycotts, petitions, lobbying.	Increased public awareness, potential for legislative changes, often less severe repercussions for participants.
Unreasonable Strategies	Strategies considered disruptive, violent, or harmful to the established order.	Riots, vandalism, armed conflict, terrorism.	Repression by authorities, potential for violence and loss of life, alienation of public support, and long-term setbacks for the movement.

The table above illustrates the diverse strategies employed by freedom activists. The consequences of adopting “unreasonable” strategies can be severe, potentially leading to increased repression, violence, and a loss of public support. It’s crucial to understand the potential repercussions before employing such tactics. The choice of strategy is often a complex calculation weighing the potential benefits against the possible risks.

Communication and Discourse in Freedom Activism

Communication is the lifeblood of freedom activism. It’s the tool activists use to raise awareness, garner support, and ultimately, effect change. How activists communicate, the messages they convey, and the tone they adopt significantly impact public perception, influencing whether they are seen as reasonable or unreasonable. Understanding the nuances of communication in this context is crucial for fostering dialogue and achieving shared goals.Effective communication is not just about the message; it’s also about the context, the audience, and the desired outcome.

Freedom activists must navigate a complex landscape where their actions and words can be interpreted in drastically different ways, depending on pre-existing biases and perspectives. Crafting a message that resonates with a broad audience while remaining true to the core principles of the movement is a constant challenge.

Analyzing the Role of Communication in Shaping Public Perception

Public perception of freedom activists is profoundly shaped by their communication strategies. A compelling narrative, delivered with empathy and respect, can garner support and understanding. Conversely, inflammatory language or aggressive tactics can alienate potential allies and reinforce negative stereotypes. The perceived reasonableness of an activist’s actions is often directly correlated to the tone and style of their communication.

Freedom activists shouldn’t be unreasonable in their demands, a simple motto. Sometimes, though, seemingly reasonable goals can lead to unforeseen complications, like those Microsoft’s WebMFA is facing. Recent issues with Microsoft’s WebMFA, detailed in this article about microsofts wmf headaches continue , highlight the importance of pragmatic approaches to achieving freedom. A well-defined strategy is key, even when fighting for a cause.

So, while the fight for freedom is important, remember that unreasonable tactics won’t always get you where you need to be.

Different Communication Styles Employed by Freedom Activists

Freedom activists employ a diverse range of communication styles, each with its own potential impact on public perception. Some activists favor reasoned arguments and evidence-based appeals to logic, emphasizing the necessity of their cause in a calm and measured manner. Others may adopt a more confrontational style, using provocative language and direct action to grab attention and challenge the status quo.

The choice of style often reflects the specific context and the desired response. For instance, a peaceful protest might utilize speeches and visual aids, while a more confrontational approach might involve boycotts or civil disobedience.

Strategies for Effective Communication Fostering Understanding

Effective communication fosters understanding by prioritizing clarity, empathy, and respect. Activist groups should strive to articulate their goals and grievances in a way that is accessible and relatable to a wider audience. Demonstrating a commitment to non-violent means, when possible, and actively seeking common ground with opponents are crucial strategies. Moreover, acknowledging opposing viewpoints and engaging in constructive dialogue, even with those who disagree, can help bridge divides.

Strategies to Avoid Accusations of Unreasonableness

To avoid accusations of unreasonableness, activists should focus on presenting their arguments logically and persuasively. Using evidence and facts to support their claims, along with clearly articulating the desired outcome, can help maintain a sense of reason. Acknowledging and addressing counterarguments can demonstrate a willingness to engage in respectful discourse and avoid polarizing language. Emphasizing the shared humanity of all parties involved and using inclusive language are equally important.

Table Illustrating Communication Methods and Perceived Impact

Communication Method	Perceived Impact on Reasonableness	Examples
Peaceful Protests	Generally perceived as reasonable, demonstrating a commitment to non-violence.	Sit-ins, marches, vigils
Civil Disobedience	May be perceived as unreasonable depending on the context and the severity of the action.	Blocking roads, trespassing, refusing to comply with laws.
Public Speeches and Presentations	Highly effective when presented with reasoned arguments, evidence, and respect.	Rallies, lectures, town hall meetings
Social Media Campaigns	Can be effective for raising awareness and mobilizing support, but can also be misused for inflammatory rhetoric.	Hashtags, online petitions, viral videos
Direct Confrontation	Generally perceived as unreasonable, unless justified by a dire situation.	Verbal confrontations, acts of defiance.

Examples of “Unreasonable” Tactics

Defining “reasonable” tactics in freedom activism is complex, as diverse groups and individuals hold varying interpretations. This section examines actions that, while potentially motivated by a desire for change, may hinder rather than advance the cause of freedom. These actions, while often born from frustration or a sense of urgency, can be counterproductive and ultimately undermine the movement’s goals.This analysis distinguishes between tactics that, while potentially controversial, remain within a framework of reasoned advocacy and those that cross a threshold into unreasonable behavior.

The effectiveness of a tactic depends not only on its immediate impact but also on its long-term consequences for the movement and the broader societal context.

Unreasonable Tactics and Their Consequences

Tactics deemed “unreasonable” often involve actions that violate established norms of civil discourse and engagement. They may include tactics that cause significant harm, incite violence, or undermine the movement’s credibility.

• Violence and Incitement to Violence: Using physical force or encouraging violence against individuals or property is demonstrably counterproductive. Such tactics can lead to arrest, imprisonment, and a severe negative public perception. Furthermore, violence often alienates potential allies and undermines the movement’s moral authority. Contrast this with non-violent protest, which can garner public support and raise awareness. A non-violent sit-in, for instance, can be highly effective at raising awareness of injustices without resorting to harm or violence.

• Disrespect for Legal Processes: Disregarding established legal procedures and norms can be seen as an unreasonable tactic. Actions like civil disobedience without a clear plan or the intention of peacefully demonstrating the inadequacy of current laws can damage the movement’s reputation. Demonstrations with clear, legal, and reasonable goals, on the other hand, can create dialogue and encourage reform. For instance, a planned protest with an emphasis on peaceful interaction and a clear set of demands, followed by a commitment to non-violent resistance, can effectively highlight the issue while limiting the potential for escalation.

• Targeting Specific Groups: Discriminating against or targeting specific groups based on ethnicity, religion, or other factors is detrimental to the movement’s cause. Such tactics can alienate potential supporters and damage the credibility of the movement. In contrast, inclusive strategies that appeal to a broader range of individuals can build a stronger foundation for support. For example, a movement advocating for environmental justice that includes all communities, regardless of their backgrounds, can be more effective than one that focuses on specific groups.

• Intentional Disinformation and Propaganda: The dissemination of false information or propaganda, even with the intent to expose injustice, undermines trust and can severely damage the movement’s credibility. Transparent and fact-based communication, even when challenging, is essential for building a foundation of trust and support. A campaign based on verifiable evidence, presented in a clear and accessible manner, can have a far more impactful outcome.

Spectrum of Tactics

This table illustrates the spectrum of tactics, from those deemed reasonable to those deemed unreasonable, with justifications for each categorization.

Category	Tactics	Justification	Effectiveness
Reasonable	Peaceful demonstrations, civil disobedience with legal strategies, public awareness campaigns, community organizing	These tactics prioritize non-violence, adherence to legal frameworks, and engagement with the community.	Generally more effective in the long run, as they build support and foster positive relationships.
Unreasonable	Violence, intimidation, harassment, targeted attacks, deliberate misinformation campaigns, disregard for legal processes	These tactics involve the use of force, disregard for established norms, and potentially cause harm to individuals or the movement.	Often counterproductive, damaging the movement’s image and alienating potential allies.

Balancing Freedom with Responsibility

Freedom activism, at its core, is about pushing boundaries and challenging the status quo. It often involves confronting powerful institutions and deeply entrenched norms. However, this pursuit of freedom shouldn’t come at the expense of a responsible and reasoned approach. The path to genuine societal change necessitates a delicate balance between the desire for radical transformation and the need to operate within the framework of acceptable societal norms and expectations.The tension between advocating for freedom and maintaining a sense of responsibility is a constant challenge for freedom activists.

Maintaining public support, avoiding counterproductive actions, and achieving lasting impact requires careful consideration of the potential consequences of their actions. A well-considered strategy acknowledges the importance of responsible discourse and action in the fight for freedom.

Strategies for Balancing Ideals and Societal Expectations

The pursuit of freedom requires navigating complex social dynamics. Freedom activists must find ways to balance their revolutionary ideals with the need for practical strategies that can garner support and achieve lasting impact. This necessitates a commitment to understanding and addressing potential concerns, fostering constructive dialogue, and demonstrating respect for differing perspectives.

Navigating the Balance: A Framework

Maintaining a balance between ideals and expectations is crucial for the effectiveness of freedom activism. This table Artikels various ways freedom activists can navigate this delicate balance:

Aspect of Activism	Balancing Strategies
Communication and Discourse	Actively engage in respectful dialogue with opponents, acknowledging their concerns, and demonstrating a willingness to compromise where possible. Use clear and concise language, avoiding inflammatory rhetoric.
Public Perception	Focus on highlighting the positive impact of the movement and its efforts to improve society. Demonstrate a commitment to non-violent strategies and a respect for the rule of law.
Tactical Choices	Select strategies that minimize potential harm and disruption to society. Prioritize peaceful methods of protest and advocacy. Carefully consider the potential consequences of each action, and anticipate the potential reactions of those affected.
Relationship with Institutions	Actively seek to engage with and influence institutions rather than simply opposing them. Advocate for policies that support freedom and social justice while acknowledging the need for institutional frameworks to operate effectively.
Internal Organization	Foster a culture of accountability and responsibility within the activist group. Ensure decisions are made through inclusive processes, with a focus on consensus and shared goals.

The Role of Reason in Achieving Freedom

Reason, in the context of freedom activism, is not simply logic devoid of emotion. It’s a multifaceted approach that blends rational argumentation with a deep understanding of human needs, motivations, and societal structures. It’s the ability to critically assess situations, identify underlying causes of oppression, and formulate strategies that are both effective and ethically sound. Freedom activists employing reason recognize that progress often requires a delicate balance between challenging the status quo and building consensus.Reasoned arguments play a crucial role in influencing public opinion and policymakers.

By presenting well-supported evidence, logical deductions, and compelling narratives, activists can effectively communicate the need for change. This process necessitates understanding the target audience’s values and concerns, and framing arguments in a way that resonates with their worldview. This allows activists to move beyond simplistic rhetoric and engage in meaningful dialogue.

Reasoned Arguments in Influencing Public Opinion

Effective communication is critical to shaping public opinion. Activists must craft arguments that are clear, concise, and relatable. This requires understanding the target audience’s values, concerns, and existing biases. Framing arguments in a way that resonates with the audience’s worldview and addressing potential counterarguments strengthens the persuasiveness of the message. Presenting evidence and data in a transparent and accessible manner further enhances the impact of reasoned arguments.

Effectiveness of Reasoned Strategies

Reasoned strategies, when implemented effectively, can significantly increase the likelihood of achieving freedom goals. They foster trust, encourage collaboration, and create a more receptive environment for change. By demonstrating a commitment to reasoned discourse, activists can build credibility and legitimacy, which are essential for long-term success. A well-reasoned approach can also help de-escalate conflict and prevent misunderstandings, enabling activists to build bridges and garner support from diverse groups.

De-escalating Conflict Through Reasoned Discourse

Reasoned discourse provides a vital tool for de-escalating conflict and fostering understanding. By focusing on shared values and common goals, activists can bridge divides and encourage dialogue between opposing viewpoints. This process requires empathy, active listening, and a willingness to compromise. By creating spaces for respectful dialogue, activists can help bridge the gap between different perspectives and find common ground.

Historical Examples of Reasoned Approaches Leading to Success

Movement	Reasoned Approach	Outcome
Civil Rights Movement (US)	Nonviolent protests, legal challenges, and public awareness campaigns emphasizing the injustice of segregation and discrimination.	Landmark legislation dismantling segregation and promoting equal rights.
Suffragette Movement (UK and US)	Peaceful demonstrations, lobbying efforts, and public education campaigns highlighting the importance of women’s suffrage.	The achievement of women’s right to vote in many countries.
Abolitionist Movement (US)	Publication of anti-slavery literature, public speeches, and lobbying efforts highlighting the moral and economic arguments against slavery.	The abolition of slavery in the United States.

Reasoned strategies, when employed effectively, have demonstrably contributed to positive social change. These examples highlight the power of logic, evidence, and ethical arguments in influencing public opinion and policymakers. They show that a focus on reasoned approaches can lead to significant progress in achieving freedom goals.

Public Perception of Freedom Activists

Public perception plays a crucial role in the success or failure of any freedom movement. How society views activists directly impacts their ability to garner support, mobilize resources, and achieve their goals. Understanding these perceptions is essential for evaluating the historical trajectory of freedom struggles and anticipating future challenges. The public’s perception often hinges on whether activists are seen as reasonable and justified in their methods.Different groups hold varying opinions on the legitimacy and effectiveness of freedom movements.

This can be influenced by a multitude of factors, including the nature of the movement itself, the historical context, the media’s portrayal, and the political climate of the time. Negative perceptions can hinder the movement’s progress, while positive ones can accelerate it. Examining the historical context of different freedom struggles reveals how public opinion has shifted and evolved over time.

Varying Public Perceptions of Freedom Movements

Different freedom movements throughout history have been met with diverse public responses. Public opinion is not static and can shift depending on the context and the specific tactics employed by the activists. These shifting perceptions can be influenced by factors such as the perceived threat to the existing order, the moral standing of the cause, and the strategies employed.

It’s crucial to analyze the historical record to understand the complexities and nuances of these public reactions.

Impact of Public Perception on Freedom Movement Success

Public perception significantly impacts the success of a freedom movement. A positive perception can lead to increased support, funding, and participation. Conversely, a negative perception can result in resistance, opposition, and even violence. Historical examples show how movements perceived as unreasonable or violent have struggled to gain widespread support, while those presented as reasonable and just have been more successful in achieving their goals.

Reasonableness and Public Support

The public’s perception of reasonableness strongly influences support for freedom activists. Activists who are seen as employing rational and peaceful methods are more likely to garner public support. This is often because reasonable tactics are seen as less threatening and more aligned with the values of the majority. Conversely, movements perceived as resorting to violence or extremism are more likely to face opposition and alienation.

Examples include the civil rights movement in the United States, which employed non-violent resistance, and its impact on public perception.

Comparison of Public Perceptions Across Freedom Movements

Freedom Movement	Public Perception (Early Stages)	Public Perception (Later Stages)	Factors Influencing Perception
American Revolution	Initially viewed with suspicion and hostility by the British public, but gained support as the movement progressed.	Ultimately seen as a justifiable rebellion against tyranny.	Propaganda, escalating violence, and the desire for independence.
Civil Rights Movement (US)	Met with widespread resistance and violence, particularly from white supremacist groups.	Gained broad public support as non-violent tactics demonstrated the injustices of segregation.	Racial prejudice, media coverage of violence, and the moral arguments for equality.
Women’s Suffrage Movement	Considered radical and unreasonable by many, particularly men.	Gained acceptance and eventual victory as the movement presented a logical argument for equal rights.	Gender roles, societal expectations, and the legal framework of the time.

Note: This table provides a simplified overview and further research would be required for a more comprehensive analysis. Perceptions varied across different regions and demographics within each movement.

Wrap-Up

In conclusion, the motto “Motto for freedom activists: don’t be unreasonable” underscores the crucial role of reason in achieving freedom. History reveals that movements that effectively balance passionate ideals with reasoned strategies are more likely to succeed. Ultimately, this exploration emphasizes the need for freedom activists to be both resolute in their pursuit of freedom and mindful of the importance of reason, communication, and responsibility in achieving lasting change.